Games ‘Allow’ War Crimes (Part 1/2)
War-depicting video games have come under fire because they ‘permit’ the execution of war crimes.
-
Various Human rights groups played the games to see if any broke humanitarian wars that govern what is and isn’t a war crime.
-
The survey condemned the games for violating laws by killing civilians, blowing up houses at will and torturing captives.
-
It said that game manufacturers should work harder to inform the players about real-world limitations for their actions.
-
Limitless war
-
Trial and Pro Juventute were the two human rights groups to examine the games. Staff played the games in the presence of human-rights lawyers, who were skilled in the interpretation of Humanitarian law.
-
Twenty games were scrutinised to see if they were portrayed under the same limits as the real world.
-
‘The practically complete absence or rules or sanctions is…astonishing’ said the study.
-
Army of Two, Call of Duty 5, Far Cry 2 and Conflict Desert Storm were a few of the many games examined.
-
The games were analysed to see ‘whether certain scenes and acts committed by the player would constitute violations of international law if they were real, rather than virtual’.
-
The study chose games, rather than films, because of their interactivity.
-
“Thus,” said the report, “the line between the virtual and real experience becomes blurred and the game becomes a simulation of real life situations on the battlefield.”
-
The study was used to check if there were any violations of the Geneva Convention and its additional protocols which cover war.
-
to be continued…
Short URL: http://thegamershub.net/?p=952
